A hit-and-run case on Gurugram’s Golf Course Road that turned out to be a hit-and-run has generated a torrent of angry online reactions after a woman biker claimed that a car followed her and hit her motorcycle. It happened Sunday morning and was captured on an action camera on the biker’s motorcycle, then circulated widely online.
The woman, known as “Rebel Wheels Sia” on Instagram, said that she was riding her Aprilia RS 457 with a group of bikers when the occupants of a car started following them. “They kept coming close to her motorcycle and made comments and gestures that made her feel uncomfortable,” she said.
She said the occupants seemed to be drunk and asked her to stop. But worried the car would cut her off or force her to stop, she kept riding. One of her fellow riders allegedly tried to position his motorcycle between the car and the woman to prevent the car from getting too close.
The situation was only exacerbated when the car tried to overtake the motorcycle. The biker said that it hit her bike from the side and she fell into the road. The motorcycle also skidded off after the collision.
Viral video fuels controversy
The incident received attention when a video taken by the motorcycle action camera was posted on social media. It appears that the car has touched the motorcycle in the video and is driving on the road.
Police have filed a case, and the video has raised the public’s interest in the case. The footage and the competing accounts are now central to the discussion of the crash.
But the lawyer of the alleged car driver Kalyan Bainsla has disputed the biker's version of events and attributed the collision to the motorcycle rider.
Lawyer provides a different account.
Bainsla’s lawyer said he was travelling with four other people, his sister, an elder brother, and his aunt’s son. He said the group had travelled to Delhi to meet relatives and was returning to Gurugram when the incident occurred.
The lawyer claimed that a large group of bikers was travelling on the road and that their movement contributed to the accident. The biker came from the right while the car was on the left, and the driver was trying to avoid the footpath, said the lawyer.
The attorney also claimed that the biker was moving very fast. He questioned whether the road was appropriate for such speeds and said this in the road-safety context.
He also accused the woman of using the incident to attract attention on social media and gain followers. That has drawn criticism on the Internet, too, and many people say that the collision should be proven through an impartial investigation rather than social media claims.
THE BIKER'S VERSION.
— Rahul Shivshankar (@RShivshankar) September 15, 2026
After the man who mowed her down tried to play victim the woman biker makes a case against him purely on video evidence.
Astonishingly the police are yet to arrest her assailant.
Watch the video she refers to here again. pic.twitter.com/CGTLmLa26F
Why did the driver leave?
Another factor at the center of that case is whether or not the car driver fled the scene after the collision.
Bainsla’s attorney told the court that his client was worried that he and the other occupants could be attacked or lynched by the group of bikers. He said leaving the location was an act of self-defense.
In the meantime, the explanation is another point of contention as the accident video continues to circulate online.
The vehicle owner clarifies how he is involved in the process.
The car involved in the incident is registered in the name of a person identified as Manish. Manish has said he was not driving the vehicle at the time of the crash.
Although the biker and the suspect’s legal team have given differing accounts of the timeline, all of these facts remain under investigation.
The Gurugram Police have registered a case in connection with the incident. The viral footage, statements from those involved, and other evidence are expected to be important in determining what happened on Golf Course Road.
The case has also revived the conversation regarding road safety, responsible driving, interactions between bikers and drivers in a high-density urban environment, and the risk of confrontations. The biker has made serious charges against the car occupants, and the lawyer has made a substantially different claim, but they should be set aside, and the facts that the investigation has established should be considered.
