Many discussions about the long hours of work the film industry brings and the middle ground between work and life can get contentious. This week, actor Kunal Kemmu weighed in, and in line with ongoing waves of comments on actors wishing for shorter shifts, took off recently. His remarks add fuel to the discussion of whether Bollywood should consider regulated working hours for actors who are also parents.
The discussion started after reports that Deepika Padukone suggested eight-hour shifts for actors, citing the difficulties of juggling motherhood and acting. This notion was welcomed by many who think the industry requires healthier working conditions. Others say however, that filmmaking is a whimsical affair which doesn’t necessarily slot neatly into rigid timelines.
Kunal Kemmu was firm, arguing:
“You don’t become an accidental mother” emphasizing that becoming a parent is a mindful decision and takes forethought. He said actors need to realize the industry doesn’t have to conform to personal tastes on an overnight basis. Only producers are authorized to set schedules, he insists. If actors are the ones who want control they should step into production themselves. Kemmu’s remarks express a more conservative view of the industry, one in which long hours are routine and work is seen as part of the profession.
The Larger Debate
- Actors’ Point of View: Many actors, more women in particular, are demanding shorter shifts to preserve their health along with balancing the home with work.
- Producers’ View Point: With shorter hours, there can be more money to be spent, and to put out longer production timelines as well. Films become less manageable.
- Industry Reality: Bollywood has for ages a reputation for filming 12–14 hours, and this system would have to change drastically if it is to be transformed.
The debate on this issue is not simply about actors it speaks to larger struggles of workers’ rights in creative industries. As Bollywood comes to the international stage, embracing progressive working methods could provide its better image and get more talent. Kemmu is part of that pushback, but it also reveals exactly how entrenched the present system remains.
Kunal Kemmu’s remarks have been met with fierce criticism. To some, his words offer practical advice; to others, he dismisses as insufficient the imperative for reform. The conflict between what was and what is is alive and well, and now there is that fundamental question: To live into its past or innovate to create a better working environment for everyone?
