For students to move from one college to another was previously forbidden, as the Delhi High Court recently confirmed via a decree and invalidated a hotly-debated requirement on inter‑college migration of undergraduate medical students. In 2023, the National Medical Commission introduced this rule, which outlawed even genuine cases by students from transferring between colleges.
The court ruled the ban was not fair (without exception) and contrary to the principle of equality. For a lot of students, even if they are struggling in their health or find themselves unable to balance their studies, the decision offers a sense of relief, an opportunity to go on with their studies in a more encouraging environment. The issue that led to this decision was a visually-impaired student who applied to relocate from a government medical college in Rajasthan to Delhi over serious health issues. Regulation 18 allowed no exceptions, and this request was refused.
The judges noted that such inflexible rules disregard human realities and can be gratuitously burdensome. Education policies, however, should be flexible enough to take special circumstances into account not to have them arbitrary and unconstitutional, they noted. The High Court has made room for greater compassion in medical education by overturning the rule. Migration between colleges, if the right reasons for doing so and appropriate protocol are provided, will now be possible. It also told the NMC to find something of a balanced policy of consideration to protect the interests of the student body alongside maintaining the rules of propriety and disciplinary discipline at the administrative authority of the institutions.
That way you get that in any future transfer is not going to be a one-off, it’s not going to “have to be off hand automatic like that – it should be determined purely on merit or in demand and a bit much will be determined by merit and a bit less on circumstances”. This has implications across the board to make it more fair to all involved. The decision has raised many questions within academia.
Some people believe it will aid those students that might need time, or facility or even health, support, and for others worry about where the migration is used for convenience. But the larger point is quite clear: educations should treat people with dignity, not just as property to be moved around with. The ruling from the Delhi High Court should be a reminder to regulators that rules should be for students, not lock them up. In the end, such a decision counts for compassion and constitutional integrity in the medical education in India.
Comments