Artificial intelligence (AI) is being adopted at lightning speed across industries and this has led to fears about job security as companies automate jobs in order to cut costs and increase productivity.
But something unexpected is starting to happen businesses that once laid people off so they could automate their work with AI are now bringing them back because the technology can’t do every job right.
This shift emphasizes how much we depend on artificial intelligence too heavily and whether companies moved too fast in automating jobs.
The trend (sometimes called the ‘AI boomerang effect’) reflects an increasing awareness among employers that replacing people with machines is not always a good business strategy.
Research cited by Fast Company found that nearly 32% of hiring managers surveyed by staffing firm Robert Half said their companies had eliminated positions because of productivity gains from AI or automation only to rehire for the same or similar roles later on. The survey polled 2,000 US hiring managers.
One big reason for this reversal is that AI can’t handle complicated situations. Automated systems can do repetitive tasks, answer basic customer questions and process information quickly but they don’t always work well in situations where judgment, emotional understanding and decision making are required (human).
Customer service is one area where these limitations have become very visible. Companies that deployed AI chatbots to reduce their dependence on human support teams found they couldn’t provide personalised help or solutions for unusual problems when customers needed it. So some companies have had to rethink their approach and start recruiting human representatives again.
The automotive industry is another example of why human expertise matters. Ford brought back experienced engineers to build up its vehicle quality and engineering processes because it understood that humans had to be involved in spotting problems that automated systems might not pick up.
Another issue to consider is the hidden cost of replacing people with technology. AI adoption may appear to reduce salary expenses at first but companies also need to factor in software costs, maintenance, training, monitoring and resources needed to correct mistakes.
In other cases productivity gains from automation haven’t been as large as expected. Employees who remain in the organisation end up doing more checking AI-generated work; solving problems automated systems cannot solve.
The reversal also shows the value of institutional knowledge. Experienced employees know company processes, customer expectations and workplace challenges that cannot always be put into an AI system. Replacing that experience can cause problems that only become apparent after employees have left.
However, the rise of rehiring doesn’t necessarily mean companies are abandoning AI. Rather many organisations are re-thinking how humans and technology can work together.
AI will continue to automate repetitive work and increase efficiency but at the same time employees may increasingly focus on supervision, creativity, problem solving, communication and strategic decision making.
These developments teach businesses an important lesson: fewer employees don’t automatically mean better productivity.
Companies will continue to invest in AI but the challenge will be finding the right balance between automation and human expertise. Instead of replacing every worker with technology maybe organisations could get better results by letting AI support employees rather than trying to replace them completely.
Comments